<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>nathenson&#039;s digital garbage &#187; Books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalgarbage.net/category/books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalgarbage.net</link>
	<description>dumpster-diving for bits about info, tech, law, and culture -- adding to the infoglut one post at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>James Gleick on the future of books</title>
		<link>http://digitalgarbage.net/2008/11/30/james-gleick-on-the-future-of-books/</link>
		<comments>http://digitalgarbage.net/2008/11/30/james-gleick-on-the-future-of-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 16:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ira Nathenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalgarbage.net/?p=652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The great science writer James Gleick writes in today&#8217;s NYT about the future of books: As a technology, the book is like a hammer. That is to say, it is perfect: a tool ideally suited to its task. Hammers can be tweaked and varied but will never go obsolete. Even when builders pound nails by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The great science writer <a href="http://www.around.com/">James Gleick</a> writes in <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/30/opinion/30gleick.html">today&#8217;s NYT</a> about the future of books:</p>
<blockquote><p>As a technology, the book is like a hammer. That is to say, it is perfect: a  tool ideally suited to its task. Hammers can be tweaked and varied but will  never go obsolete. Even when builders pound nails by the thousand with pneumatic  nail guns, every household needs a hammer. Likewise, the bicycle is alive and  well. It was invented in a world without automobiles, and for speed and range it  was quickly surpassed by motorcycles and all kinds of powered scooters. But  there is nothing quaint about bicycles. They outsell cars.</p></blockquote>
<p>The op-ed is a thoughtful take on the future of books, including the significance of the recent settlement of the Google Book Search litigation, in which Gleick played a role as a negotiator for the authors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitalgarbage.net/2008/11/30/james-gleick-on-the-future-of-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
