<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>nathenson&#039;s digital garbage &#187; Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalgarbage.net/tag/supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalgarbage.net</link>
	<description>dumpster-diving for bits about law, info, tech, and culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 05:00:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Supreme Court website</title>
		<link>http://digitalgarbage.net/2010/03/18/new-supreme-court-website/</link>
		<comments>http://digitalgarbage.net/2010/03/18/new-supreme-court-website/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ira Nathenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalgarbage.net/?p=1725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SCOTUSblog reports that the Supreme Court today unveiled a revamped website, which will now be hosted in-house rather than by the Government Printing Office (press release here).  The new site is much cleaner and makes finding information much easier. Considering &#8230; <a href="http://digitalgarbage.net/2010/03/18/new-supreme-court-website/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SCOTUSblog <a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/2010/03/changes-for-courts-website/">reports</a> that the Supreme Court today unveiled a revamped website, which will now be hosted in-house rather than by the Government Printing Office (press release <a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/SCt-website-release-3-18-10.pdf">here</a>).  The new site is much cleaner and makes finding information much easier.</p>
<p>Considering the popularity of Supreme Court bobbleheads (as <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/18/us/18bobble.html">reported</a> in yesterday&#8217;s New York Times), maybe the Court should next set up a Facebook page.   I&#8217;d be happy to friend some of the Justices, starting with <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/03/22/100322fa_fact_toobin">Stevens</a>, who has several Facebook pages devoted to him, including <a href="http://www.facebook.com/search/?ref=search&amp;q=justice john paul stevens&amp;init=quick#!/pages/John-Paul-Stevens/286034887864">John Paul Stevens</a>, <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/John-Paul-Stevens-Bowties/74532218111">John Paul Stevens&#8217; Bowties</a>, and <a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=7498785287">John Paul Stevens: The Most Adorable Supreme Court Justice</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://digitalgarbage.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/SCOTUS.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1727" title="SCOTUS" src="http://digitalgarbage.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/SCOTUS.jpg" alt="" width="614" height="461" /></a></p>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow: hidden; top: 0px; left: -10000px;">http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/SCt-website-release-3-18-10.pdf</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitalgarbage.net/2010/03/18/new-supreme-court-website/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BOGO day for patents at the Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://digitalgarbage.net/2007/04/30/bogo-day-for-patents-at-the-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://digitalgarbage.net/2007/04/30/bogo-day-for-patents-at-the-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ira Nathenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalgarbage.net/2007/04/30/bogo-day-for-patents-at-the-supreme-court/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SCOTUSblog reports that the Supreme Court today issued decisions in two high-profile patent cases. According to SCOTUSblog, Microsoft won (7-1) in Microsoft v. AT&#38;T, and in KSR v. Teleflex, a unanimous Court ruled that the Federal Circuit had applied too &#8230; <a href="http://digitalgarbage.net/2007/04/30/bogo-day-for-patents-at-the-supreme-court/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SCOTUSblog <a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/2007/04/court_rules_for.html">reports</a> that the Supreme Court today issued decisions in two high-profile patent cases.  According to SCOTUSblog, Microsoft won (7-1) in <em>Microsoft v. AT&amp;T</em>, and in <em>KSR v. Teleflex</em>, a unanimous Court ruled that the Federal Circuit had applied too narrow a standard for determining &#8220;obviousness.&#8221;</p>
<p>Note: BOGO means &#8220;buy one, get one free.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitalgarbage.net/2007/04/30/bogo-day-for-patents-at-the-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court grants cert in KSR v. Teleflex</title>
		<link>http://digitalgarbage.net/2006/06/26/supreme-court-grants-cert-in-ksr-v-teleflex/</link>
		<comments>http://digitalgarbage.net/2006/06/26/supreme-court-grants-cert-in-ksr-v-teleflex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 15:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ira Nathenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalgarbage.net/2006/06/26/supreme-court-grants-cert-in-ksr-v-teleflex/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Out with the old and in with the new. Although Labcorp v. Metabolite was dismissed last week, in this morning&#8217;s order list, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in KSR v. Teleflex (No. 04-1350, docket here). Previous commentary at Patently-O. The &#8230; <a href="http://digitalgarbage.net/2006/06/26/supreme-court-grants-cert-in-ksr-v-teleflex/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out with the old and in with the new.</p>
<p>Although <em>Labcorp v. Metabolite</em> <a href="http://digitalgarbage.net/2006/06/22/labcorp-v-metabolite-dismissed/">was dismissed</a> last week, in this morning&#8217;s <a href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/orders/courtorders/062606pzor.pdf">order list</a>, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in <em>KSR v. Teleflex</em> (No. 04-1350, <a href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/04-1350.htm">docket here</a>).  Previous commentary at <a href="http://patentlaw.typepad.com/patent/2005/06/case_on_obvious.html">Patently-O</a>.  The issue is the obviousness test used by the Federal Circuit in patent cases.  This promises to be a major case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitalgarbage.net/2006/06/26/supreme-court-grants-cert-in-ksr-v-teleflex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LabCorp v. Metabolite dismissed</title>
		<link>http://digitalgarbage.net/2006/06/22/labcorp-v-metabolite-dismissed/</link>
		<comments>http://digitalgarbage.net/2006/06/22/labcorp-v-metabolite-dismissed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ira Nathenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalgarbage.net/2006/06/22/labcorp-v-metabolite-dismissed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court issued a decision this morning dismissing the writ of certiorari in Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings v. Metabolite Laboratories, Inc. as improvidently granted. Justice Breyer, joined by Justices Stevens and Souter, dissented from the dismissal. Decision here. &#8230; <a href="http://digitalgarbage.net/2006/06/22/labcorp-v-metabolite-dismissed/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court issued a decision this morning dismissing the writ of certiorari in <em>Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings v. Metabolite Laboratories, Inc.</em> as improvidently granted.  Justice Breyer, joined by Justices Stevens and Souter, dissented from the dismissal.</p>
<p>Decision <a href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05pdf/04-607.pdf">here</a>.  Discussion at <a href="http://www.patentlyo.com/">Patently-O</a> <a href="http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2006/06/exhale_supreme_.html">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitalgarbage.net/2006/06/22/labcorp-v-metabolite-dismissed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

