<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>nathenson&#039;s digital garbage &#187; Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalgarbage.net/tag/twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalgarbage.net</link>
	<description>dumpster-diving for bits about info, tech, law, and culture -- adding to the infoglut one post at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Umpire Jim Joyce, a near-perfect game, Twitter spam, and the wisdom of &#8220;Tin Cup&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://digitalgarbage.net/2010/06/05/jim-joyce-near-perfect-game/</link>
		<comments>http://digitalgarbage.net/2010/06/05/jim-joyce-near-perfect-game/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 18:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ira Nathenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infoglut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["Tin Cup"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Umpires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikipedia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalgarbage.net/?p=1768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having read about the blown call that cost Detroit pitcher Armando Galarraga a perfect game on the 27th batter, I became interested in the umpire, Jim Joyce.  After making a bad first-plate safe call that cost Galarraga a perfect game on what should have been the very last out, Joyce acted with grace, apologizing directly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having read about the <a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/tom_verducci/06/02/joyces.missed.call/index.html">blown call</a> that cost Detroit pitcher Armando Galarraga a perfect game on the 27th batter, I became interested in the umpire, Jim Joyce.  After making a bad first-plate safe call that cost Galarraga a perfect game <em>on what should have been the very last out</em>, Joyce acted with grace, apologizing directly and profusely to Galarraga.  As <a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/tom_verducci/06/02/joyces.missed.call/index.html">SI notes</a>, Joyce was &#8220;crushed.&#8221;  Galarraga also acted with class, saying &#8220;I give a lot of credit to the guy saying, &#8216;Hey, I need to talk to you because I really say I&#8217;m sorry.&#8217;&#8221;  Both of them are professionals with class.  After all, it&#8217;s when you screw up, or when somebody&#8217;s error screws you, that your character really shines (or doesn&#8217;t).</p>
<p>Too bad that some of the amateurs on the Web don&#8217;t have similar class.  Shortly after the bad call, somebody <a href="http://mlb.fanhouse.com/2010/06/02/jim-joyce-declared-dead-on-wikipedia-following-perfect-game-gaf/">vandalized</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Joyce">Joyce&#8217;s Wikipedia page</a> to declare he was <a href="http://mlb.fanhouse.com/2010/06/02/jim-joyce-declared-dead-on-wikipedia-following-perfect-game-gaf/">dead</a>.  That&#8217;s just sick.  Yesterday, I saw that Joyce&#8217;s name was a trending Twitter topic, but the results were polluted with Twitter spam.</p>
<p>Such online foolishness illustrates what Andrew Keen derided as the &#8220;Cult of the Amateur&#8221; in his <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Cult-Amateur-MySpace-user-generated-destroying/dp/0385520816">book</a> by the same name.  Keen says:</p>
<blockquote><p>We &#8212; those of us who want to know more about the world, those of us who are the consumers of mainstream culture &#8212; are being seduced by the empty promise of the &#8220;democratized&#8221; media.  For the real consequence of the Web 2.0 revolution is less culture, less reliable news, and a chaos of useless information.  One chilling reality in this brave new digital epoch is the blurring, obfuscation, and even disappearance of truth.</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-1768"></span>In some ways, the foolishness of Wiki vandals and Twitter spammers provides support for Keen&#8217;s observations.  But Keen&#8217;s critiques of amateurs are also somewhat overblown.  Keen&#8217;s preference for traditional &#8220;experts&#8221; over Web 2.0 &#8220;amateurs&#8221; ignores that the distinctions between the two are not always clear.  Indeed, in federal court, the qualification of a witness as an &#8220;<a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rules.htm#Rule701">expert</a>&#8221; permitted to provide opinion testimony on &#8220;scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge&#8221; is often sharply argued.  Plus, traditional experts are also subject to error, as amply illustrated by Joyce&#8217;s bad call.</p>
<p>But Joyce has class, something that doesn&#8217;t require, or always come with, expertise.  You either have it or you don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Also, even without a perfect game, Galarraga&#8217;s game combined with Joyce&#8217;s bad call are the stuff of legend.  As Paul Clemens noted in the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/05/opinion/05clemens.html">New York Times</a>, the replays of the bad call may become &#8220;baseball&#8217;s Zapruder film.&#8221;  Such immediate-legend status is even better illustrated by <a href="http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Tin_Cup">this exchange</a> between Kevin Costner (Roy) and Rene Russo (Molly) in the classic sports  film <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0117918/"><em>Tin Cup</em></a>.  Immediately prior, golfer Roy loses the U.S. Open by massively blowing par by stubbornly refusing to take a lay-up shot on the 18th hole for an easy win.  Instead, he tries (repeatedly) to hit the ball over a long water hazard.  Roy loses the tournament, but wins the hearts of the fans, and of Molly:</p>
<blockquote><p>Molly: That was incredible! That was the shot of the tournament!</p>
<p>Roy: I just gave away the U.S. Open.</p>
<p>Molly: It doesn&#8217;t matter.</p>
<p>Roy: One time in my life I know the safe play to hit and I still&#8230;Shit, I still can&#8217;t make myself do it.</p>
<p>Molly: It doesn&#8217;t matter.</p>
<p>Roy: My whole career, my whole life on the line&#8230;I just made a 12 on the last hole of the Open!</p>
<p>Molly: You sure did. It was the greatest 12 of all time. No one&#8217;s going to remember the Open 10 years from now, who won&#8230;but they&#8217;ll remember your 12! My, God, Roy, it was&#8230;Well, it&#8217;s immortal! I am so proud of you!</p></blockquote>
<p>Sometimes it&#8217;s the ones that get away that are the most memorable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitalgarbage.net/2010/06/05/jim-joyce-near-perfect-game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Random Twittery thoughts</title>
		<link>http://digitalgarbage.net/2009/01/19/random-twittery-thoughts/</link>
		<comments>http://digitalgarbage.net/2009/01/19/random-twittery-thoughts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ira Nathenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steelers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tweets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalgarbage.net/?p=873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Twittered Inauguration. Though I doubt President Obama will twitter from the podium tomorrow, many others at the inauguration will post tweets, photos, and videos at what the NY Times is calling a &#8220;wireless Woodstock.&#8221;  Although wireless networks are adding extra capacity, they&#8217;re still asking people to try to limit their wireless use.  No shock [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Twittered Inauguration. </strong>Though I doubt President Obama will twitter from the podium tomorrow, many others at the inauguration will post tweets, photos, and videos at what the NY Times is calling a &#8220;wireless Woodstock.&#8221;  Although wireless networks are adding <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/19/technology/19cell.html">extra capacity</a>, they&#8217;re still asking people to try to limit their wireless use.  No shock if Twitter comes to a crashing halt at some point tomorrow.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Twitter as a news source. </strong><a href="http://www.twitter.com/digitalgarbage">I like to Twitter</a>, but mostly to aggregate links of personal interest.  But Twitter is increasingly emerging as a <a href="http://blog.wired.com/business/2009/01/twitter-yahoo-b.html">powerful source of breaking news</a>.  I turned to it during the <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=gaza">Gaza invasion</a> as well as after the safe crash-landing of <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=1549">U.S. Airways Flight 1549</a>.  (The most fascinating pic was <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2009/1/us-airways-crash-rescue-picture-citizen-jouralism-twitter-at-work">taken by Floridian Janis Krums</a> and posted through Twitter.)  Though Twitter isn&#8217;t necessarily authoritative or reliable, it&#8217;s a great way of getting the pulse of what concerns people <em>right now</em>.</p>
<p><strong>You&#8217;re in Steelers Twitter Country.</strong> One last twittery thought.  Being from the Steel City, no shock that I&#8217;m a big Steelers fan.  <em>Go Steelers in Super Bowl XLIII! </em>But I gotta say: last night&#8217;s AFC Championship game was a brutal and exhausting four-hour marathon.  As Peter King <a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/peter_king/01/19/superbowl/index.html">put it</a>,&#8221;If I&#8217;ve ever been to a game with more intense hitting, I don&#8217;t remember it. This was primeval.&#8221;  Like the players on the field, I was seriously <a href="http://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/football/bal-sp.ravensside19jan19,0,3507114.story">worried for Raven <span class="adbriteinline">Willis McGahee</span></a>, who was carted from the field after a hard hit from Ryan Clark.  Although it was a physical game, this is not what you ever want to see and I hope he&#8217;s ok.  Many others shared that thought, and last night, McGahee was one of the <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=McGahee">trending searches</a> on Twitter.  I was happy to see many well-wishes for McGahee from Steelers as well as Ravens fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitalgarbage.net/2009/01/19/random-twittery-thoughts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comcast and the creepiness factor</title>
		<link>http://digitalgarbage.net/2008/07/24/comcast-creepiness-factor/</link>
		<comments>http://digitalgarbage.net/2008/07/24/comcast-creepiness-factor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 04:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ira Nathenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creepiness factor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalgarbage.net/?p=164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve written before about the &#8220;creepiness factor,&#8221; the uneasy feeling some get when they realize their blogs and social-networking postings are read by &#8220;unwanted&#8221; visitors like police, employers, professors, etc.  Add to that list corporate America.  The New York Times writes about Comcast&#8217;s efforts to reach customers complaining about it on blogs and social-networking sites.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve written <a href="http://digitalgarbage.net/2006/06/12/facebook/">before</a> about the &#8220;creepiness factor,&#8221; the uneasy feeling some get when they realize their blogs and social-networking postings are read by &#8220;unwanted&#8221; visitors like police, employers, professors, etc.  Add to that list corporate America.  The New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/25/technology/25comcast.html">writes</a> about Comcast&#8217;s efforts to reach customers complaining about it on blogs and social-networking sites.  One student complained about Comcast on his blog:</p>
<blockquote><p>Shortly afterward, he received an e-mail message from Comcast, thanking him  for the feedback and adding that it was working on a new interactive guide that  might “illuminate the issues that you are currently experiencing.”</p>
<p>[He] found it all a bit creepy.  “The rest of his e-mail may as well  have read, ‘Big Brother is watching you,’ ” he said.</p></blockquote>
<p>A woman&#8217;s Twitter complaint about Comcast led to a quick but unexpected response:</p>
<blockquote><p>“It’s one thing to spit vitriol about a company when they can’t hear you,” she  said in an interview.  It’s another, she said, when the company replies.  “I  immediately backed down and softened my tone when I knew I was talking to a real  person.”</p></blockquote>
<p>I can see why some people might be creeped out by Comcast&#8217;s outreach efforts, but they shouldn&#8217;t be.   People keep assuming that the relative anonymity of the web will keep their postings effectively invisible.  That&#8217;s naive.  There&#8217;s nothing anonymous about the Internet when postings are quickly found by those who want to see what you&#8217;re doing (such as <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/07/18/facebook.evidence.ap/index.html">prosecutors</a>, as Kaimipono Wenger <a href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/more_stupid_thi.html">blogged</a> about recently), or by companies who want to know what you&#8217;re saying about them.  The sooner people realize that &#8220;relative&#8221; web anonymity is not really anonymity at all, the more savvy they&#8217;ll hopefully become about their online postings.</p>
<p>Plus, done tactfully and personally, direct outreach by companies might be a good thing.  Direct emails?  Sure.  Public comments on blogs or Facebook walls?  Not so good.  It might embarrass already-angry customers and put them on the defensive.  Worse, it might trigger flame wars involving others.  But a direct email is far less confrontational, and far more likely to lead to satisfied, albeit occasionally creeped-out customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitalgarbage.net/2008/07/24/comcast-creepiness-factor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter microblog</title>
		<link>http://digitalgarbage.net/2008/06/30/twitter-microblog/</link>
		<comments>http://digitalgarbage.net/2008/06/30/twitter-microblog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ira Nathenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalgarbage.net/?p=109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marty Schwimmer reports that Southwestern law professor Michael Scott is using Twitter to post microblogs of articles on copyright law, internet law, and privacy law. That&#8217;s a fantastic idea, and one that solves the problem of what to do with interesting reads that are worth pointing out, but for which I don&#8217;t want to write [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marty Schwimmer <a href="http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2008/06/useful_twitter.html">reports</a> that Southwestern law professor <span class="detail"><a href="http://singularitylaw.com/?p=63">Michael Scott</a> is using Twitter to post microblogs of articles on <a href="https://twitter.com/CopyrightLaw">copyright law</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/InternetLaw">internet law</a>, and <a href="http://twitter.com/PrivacyLaw">privacy law</a>. </span></p>
<p><span class="detail">That&#8217;s a fantastic idea, and one that solves the problem of what to do with interesting reads that are worth pointing out, but for which I don&#8217;t want to write a full blog post.</span></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve created a microblog for this site <a href="http://twitter.com/digitalgarbage">here</a>.  A mini-feed can be found in the sidebar, and I&#8217;ve also created a dedicated page on this site with an expanded list of recent tweets <a href="http://digitalgarbage.net/tweets/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitalgarbage.net/2008/06/30/twitter-microblog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
